🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step represents a direct response from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in local state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders will decide in the coming days regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and economic needs.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

EU officials have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position rests on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in European countries shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal actions, such as seizing European corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a key role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

In comments seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to comment on the new legal action. It has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in European nations are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if relevant holdings can be located," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing measures to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against European entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex plan, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the money in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast destruction caused during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for financing Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a clear message that if you do all this damage to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."