🔗 Share this article

Throughout the opening pages of the publication Authentic, writer the author poses a challenge: commonplace advice to “come as you are” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are not benevolent calls for individuality – they often become snares. This initial publication – a mix of recollections, research, cultural commentary and conversations – aims to reveal how companies appropriate personal identity, shifting the burden of organizational transformation on to employees who are already vulnerable.

Professional Experience and Larger Setting

The driving force for the publication lies partially in the author’s professional path: multiple jobs across retail corporations, emerging businesses and in international development, viewed through her experience as a woman of color with a disability. The dual posture that Burey faces – a tension between standing up for oneself and aiming for security – is the engine of Authentic.

It emerges at a period of general weariness with institutional platitudes across America and other regions, as resistance to diversity and inclusion efforts increase, and numerous companies are cutting back the very systems that once promised transformation and improvement. Burey delves into that landscape to contend that withdrawing from corporate authenticity talk – that is, the business jargon that trivializes identity as a grouping of aesthetics, peculiarities and hobbies, keeping workers concerned with managing how they are seen rather than how they are handled – is not an effective response; instead, we need to reinterpret it on our personal terms.

Minority Staff and the Performance of Persona

Via vivid anecdotes and interviews, the author demonstrates how employees from minority groups – people of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, female employees, employees with disabilities – learn early on to calibrate which persona will “pass”. A sensitive point becomes a disadvantage and people try too hard by striving to seem palatable. The effort of “bringing your full self” becomes a reflective surface on which all manner of assumptions are placed: emotional work, revealing details and constant performance of gratitude. As the author states, employees are requested to reveal ourselves – but lacking the defenses or the trust to endure what arises.

As Burey explains, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but lacking the safeguards or the reliance to survive what comes out.’

Real-Life Example: The Story of Jason

Burey demonstrates this dynamic through the account of a worker, a deaf employee who decided to educate his team members about deaf community norms and interaction standards. His eagerness to talk about his life – an act of transparency the office often commends as “authenticity” – temporarily made daily interactions easier. Yet, the author reveals, that advancement was precarious. Once personnel shifts eliminated the unofficial understanding he had established, the atmosphere of inclusion disappeared. “All the information left with them,” he states tiredly. What was left was the weariness of needing to begin again, of being made responsible for an organization’s educational process. According to Burey, this demonstrates to be requested to reveal oneself without protection: to endanger oneself in a structure that applauds your openness but fails to formalize it into policy. Genuineness becomes a trap when companies count on employee revelation rather than structural accountability.

Literary Method and Concept of Dissent

Burey’s writing is simultaneously understandable and lyrical. She combines scholarly depth with a manner of kinship: an invitation for followers to engage, to interrogate, to oppose. According to the author, dissent at work is not overt defiance but ethical rejection – the practice of rejecting sameness in environments that expect gratitude for basic acceptance. To dissent, according to her view, is to interrogate the narratives institutions narrate about justice and belonging, and to reject participation in practices that sustain injustice. It may appear as identifying prejudice in a meeting, opting out of uncompensated “inclusion” effort, or establishing limits around how much of oneself is made available to the organization. Resistance, Burey indicates, is an declaration of self-respect in spaces that typically reward obedience. It constitutes a practice of honesty rather than rebellion, a method of maintaining that one’s humanity is not conditional on organizational acceptance.

Reclaiming Authenticity

The author also avoids rigid dichotomies. Her work does not merely toss out “authenticity” wholesale: rather, she calls for its restoration. In Burey’s view, authenticity is not simply the unrestricted expression of personality that organizational atmosphere often celebrates, but a more thoughtful correspondence between personal beliefs and personal behaviors – a principle that rejects alteration by organizational requirements. Rather than viewing authenticity as a directive to overshare or adapt to sterilized models of openness, Burey advises audience to preserve the parts of it grounded in honesty, personal insight and principled vision. According to Burey, the goal is not to abandon genuineness but to relocate it – to move it out of the boardroom’s performative rituals and into connections and offices where trust, equity and answerability make {